Monday, 26 April 2010
Voiceover Evaluation
Monday, 19 April 2010
How Do My Products Compare To Real Media Products
-
To compare my film poster with a professional media product I am going to be using the poster for the film 'The Last House On The left'. I have chosen this professional media product for comparison because, like with my poster, the main image is of a house. Here is the Film Poster for "The Last House On The Left":
-

-
For Comparison purposes, I am going to be analysing Two main areas:
-
Denotation and layout: Comparing this poster to mine, they layout and denotation is is similar. The main image has the house centralised in conjunction of mine, however the image on 'The Last House On The Left' itself is a much longer shot than the image used on my poster. The other three objects on the page, the name of the film, credits and slogan are again in simlar positions to mine. the slogan and credits are centralised and positioned in the same place as on my poster. The title of the film is slightly different however purly because it is a much larger title.
-
The 'Last House On The Left' poster has two very apparent differences with my poster however; the first being there is no reviews on the poster and the second being no classsification logo. The creators have done this to make the house in the long shot image the complete focus of the page, attracting people to the title and slogan of the film.
-
Denotation: Due to this Film poster and my film poster being very similar, the connotations that each poster generate are simlar. Both slogans on the posters engage the cousmer on a personal level as one is a retorical question, asking the coustmer to ask themselves what they would do, and one engages the consumer directly, as the slogan is refering to 'you'. Furthermore, the connotations of the house shots in both posters is a sinsiter location, connoting the genre of the film as well as causing the consmer to ask themselves more questions about what goes on at that location, thus generating the apprehension that a poster is supposed to.
-
Film Magazine Front Cover
-
To compare my film Magazine front cover with a professional media product I am going to be using the Magazine front cover from 'Total Film' a famous professional film magazine. I have chosen this professional media product for comparison because is it the type of magazine front cover I was trying to emulate in the creation of my magazine front cover. Firstly, here is the front cover I have chosen to analyse:
-

-
Like with the analysis of the film posters, i am going to be looking at two main areas for comparison:
-
Denotation and layout: This magazine front cover, though it is centralised on a horror film, has quite a few differences to the layout and denotations as my magazine front cover. in comparison to my magazine front cover, this magazine is quite conventional. The first main difference is that this total film magazine front cover is much brighter, the prodominat colour being white while it being greys, blacks and reds on my magazine front cover. Another distinctive difference between the two is that my magazine as distinct font and object differences; for example, my magazine has two three dimentional starts in the bottom left corner and top right corner, which is somthing that this magazine for total film did not include.
-
some similarities between the two magazine front covers is that the title of the magazine is at the top of the magazine and underlapped by the images. furthermore, all other text and objects are leading down the right and left of the pages.
-
Connotation: Though the magazines in themselves are different, the connotations are very similar. This is because that magazine front covers are constructed to make the magazine eye catching and create shelf appeal. in terms of this, both magazines are effective because they have eye catching in different ways
Friday, 9 April 2010
Evaluation Of Magazine Front Cover for No.38
.jpg)
Feedback
Evaluation Of Film Poster for No.38
.jpg)
Evaluation Of Group & Own Performance
In this final section I will be evaluating the different aspects of my own performance and commenting on how this could be improved. The different aspects are:
- Production of Research and Planning
- Production of Media Products (Trailer, Poster and Magazine Front Cover)
- Time Keeping
- Working In A team
- Production of Research and Planning
As this section was simplistic in terms of researching information about the genre , I experienced no difficulties and had effective strategies for gathering information which involved being organised , methodical and thorough. In terms of planning the project, this was done with my other team members. We were ultimately able to complete this aspect to the satisfaction of the team but had to overcome initial differences in certain areas. .Tasks were distributed fairly between the three of us but we initially found it hard to agree on the treatment of the trailer, so much so that we ended up producing four different treatments. Another problem that occurred in this section was that we initially did not know we had to post all our work onto the blogger website. We had collated all our work into one presentation and subsequently had to convert it all to make it suitable for the blogger website.
Production of Media Products
Trailer: This section of the production part of the project was done as a group. We completed our trailer efficiently, using my own personal laptop and a teammate’s camera. As we had our own equipment, it meant that we could produce the trailer without having to source materials elsewhere. We took most of our shots very quickly at the production stage of the project, and had soon developed a basis for the trailer. As a group we had no problem sharing the workload and unlike the planning stage, we agreed on most decisions, with the exception of an issue over sound and pace as we started to develop the trailer more. To rectify this, we incorporated more short, almost ‘blip’ like shots, and I located a website that allowed you to download professional sounds which suited our purposes exactly.
Film Poster & Magazine Front Cover: These where my ancillary tasks and had to be completed on my own. These posed more of a problem than the trailer as I had some software issues. I firstly opted to create them both on Adobe Photoshop, but changed my mind when I found the software too hard to use. I managed to complete them using Microsoft publisher to a professional standard after producing four drafts and a final piece for each.
Time Keeping
This is referring to how well I was able to meet deadlines and how I managed the time I needed to complete this project. I would say I did this effectively even though my ancillary tasks took longer than I had planned. This overlapped onto time I needed to do this evaluation comfortably but hopefully has not affected the standard of it.
Working In A Team
I found working in a team to be a positive experience. My team members had similar opinions, views, work ethics and focuses. We were able to resolve problems in a friendly and constructive manner, tasks were divided fairly and everyone's opinions and suggestions were valued. I felt we worked very efficiently as a group.
Evaluation Of Media Technologies
In this section of the evaluation I am going to be assessing the use of the different media technologies that I used to produce and finalize this project. I will be discussing why I used them, how effective I though they where and whether or not I had any issues with them. The media technologies and software’s that I used to complete this project are the following:
- Imovie
- YouTube
- Blogger
- Standard Camera
Imovie
This was the software package created by Apple and used on Apple Macs. It is what we used to create our trailer. In our College we have two Macs, however, I own my own Mac laptop with this software on it, and therefore meaning it was efficient for us to use my laptop due to there being three groups.
This software was very effective. The editing tools that where available on it where perfectly adequate for the type of editing that we needed to do. The layout of the software was efficient and easy to use. The software allowed us to import sounds, images and shots very effectively as well as offering a database of sounds, transition frames, fonts and coulors (for text shots) on its own. Furthermore, Imovie made it easy to export the completed version of the trailer.
We experienced no problems with this software; however, initially we did not know how to use the entire program effectively. This was something we cover came as we proceeded to use and get used to the software.
YouTube
We used YouTube to receive feedback from other people. We uploaded our completed trailer onto the massive internet site in the hope of receiving comments from people across the world. This worked successfully as we did receive a range of feedback.
Nothing much can be evaluated about this as all it required me to do was locate a file and press a button titled ‘Upload’, so in that sense the software was very efficient.
One problem we did experience with it was that the first time around we attempted to upload the video from the school system,. Which was blocking us from doing it.
Blogger
This was an internet blogging website that allows us to post regular pieces of information as the project was progressing. We used this to post comments throughout our planning and research primarily, but then subsequently decided to use it to post the evaluation topics furthermore.
This software was effective as the posts appeared in chronological order, and furthermore could be edited after they had been posted. The users could furthermore edit the appearance of the different blogs to make it more specific to what they where doing, for example we placed a picture of the house from our trailer on our blog.
We had one problem with this internet site and that is that you cannot order the posts once they had been posted, meaning that some things become mixed together.
Camera
The camera was very advanced, having lots of settings that attuned it to the different dark mise-en-scenes we used. Furthermore that sound quality that the camera produced was very professional. Finally, the camera was perfectly compatible with my Mac Laptop with made the whole process very effectively.